We have been wrong about what rationality means for 186 years. If that is true — and the mathematics shows it is — then almost every system built on that definition inherits the error.— Kobalt Research Program
The program started from one question: if the standard definition of rationality is self-defeating, what does a corrected definition look like? And if we correct it, what does alignment look like? And if we have a formal alignment framework, what entities are currently excluded from every system we build?
Each question opens the next. The architecture that resulted — corrected rationality, Shannon welfare functions, geometric alignment, the disaggregation cost, the PCC-W protocol — was not planned in advance. It grew from following the mathematics wherever it led.